Hi,
 
i answer with delay - in Poland November 11 is the national holiday of 
Independence
>>then i would not use underscores inside the tags and params.
 
yes - you have right here
 
>>Also i would prefer using the base operation as tag and not everything 
>>encapsulated inside <Node operation="....
 
this is not good - think about parser which display graphical plan.
It should know that some node is operation node not some property node
and it can show graphical representation without knowing all kind of operation 
at start.
Look at xml plan representation in MSSQL - i tried to follow this plan format
 
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
 
 
W dniu 2015-11-11 02:05:33 użytkownik Arno Brinkman <[email protected]> 
napisał:
Hi,
Just my 2 cents:
I can see the benefit of an XML output, but then i would not use underscores
inside the tags and params.
Also i would prefer using the base operation as tag and not everything
capsulated inside <Node operation="....">
Something like:
<SelectExpression>
<Filter>
  <NestedLoopOuterJoin>
   <NestedLoopInnerJoin>
    <Filter>
     <Table alias="R">RDB$RELATIONS</Table>
     <FullScan/>
    </Filter>
    <Filter>
     <Table alias="RF">RDB$RELATION_FIELDS</Table>
     <BitMap>
      <Index Scan="Range" Matching="Full">RDB$INDEX_4</Index>
     </BitMap>
     ..........
   </Filter>
   </NestedLoopInnerJoin>
  </NestedLoopOuterJoin>
</Filter>
</SelectExpression>
Kind Regards,
Arno Brinkman
ABVisie
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel

Reply via email to