> input/output metadata (that's IMessageMetadata, yes?) provide you with a
Yes. > set of methods needed to access data in buffer correctly > unavoidable one is getOffset() - it returns offset in a buffer where > data is placed How's some called? I see only getRelation, getOffset, getType etc. Currently I'm "reading" the values manually like this: "int value = *((char*)inMsg + offset)" where the offset I get from "inputMetadata->getOffset(status, i)". I was looking something like "int* readAsInt(<status>, <buffer>, <index>)". But maybe I'm in wrong mindset. Looking at your TypeMix union seems to be good idea (I'm used to to not be able to access memory directly in C#, so I haven't thought about it). I might eventually pass that to C#, probably. Let's see where I shoot myself into foot. > Yes, you can - but that's ugly choice. You loose for example ability to > access objects with names >31 symbol long. OK, so I'm not going to go that path. Thanks for letting me know. It might have been time wasted later. -- Mgr. Jiří Činčura Independent IT Specialist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
