16.05.2017 22:14, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > A bug was just reported for Jaybird 3 > (http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/JDBC-494); I made changes to use > RDB$RELATION_TYPE to discriminate between the different relation types, > but apparently it can be null under some conditions. > > What are those conditions, or would this be a bug in Firebird if it is > null?
Perhaps a restore from some ancient version could leave this field being NULL. The engine treats NULL as 0 (aka PERSISTENT), so it shouldn't hurt. Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
