Alexey Kovyazin wrote: > From our experience with the original Firebird documentation in > Russian, community is very effective in errors finding in Language > Reference. > Since Firebird LangRef is open source (by license and by its nature), > I suggest to start public beta reviewing as soon as possible, it will > improve the quality and reduce the time to deliver.
My concern is that publishing (and publicizing) beta docs will lead to them being widely distributed and many people will use them for reference instead of for reviewing. An alternative might be to invite knowledgeable Firebird users as beta reviewers and provide them with the material. (We could approach certain people directly and/or post a message in e.g. fb-general explaining what is needed and asking people to step forward if they feel they can help with this.) That being said, I think this should be Helen's call, because the burden of weeding through all the feedback will be largely on her. > Also, it will be ridiculous if we will announce docs for 2.5 after > 3.0 release. I don't see that as a big problem. By the time the LangRef is released, most users will still be on 2.5 or lower anyway. Cheers, Paul Vinkenoog ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Firebird-docs mailing list Firebird-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-docs
