We had encountered this one in our migration to .net provider, it caused us much pain, because divergence with other SQL providers.
I'd vote for changing this and declaring it as breaking change. With supplied fixes for existing code, of course. On 10 January 2017 at 16:20, Jiří Činčura <j...@cincura.net> wrote: > Hi *, > > we have this ticket DNET-509 in tracker. Although I agree the change > would be nice, it's also a breaking change as huge as it can get. What's > your take on it? Or do you see clean way out? > > -- > Mgr. Jiří Činčura > Independent IT Specialist > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Firebird-net-provider mailing list > Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Firebird-net-provider mailing list Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-net-provider
