> Netscreen¡¯s Perofmance should be examined in the > real network, as it shows quite different > performance.
What do you mean by this? do you mean its slower or faster (yea right) than what they (being netscreen) say? --- Pico GOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Netscreen is quite simple firewall, it is more less > Network device not a intelligent firewall¡¦.. > If you need for the soho the mid-range firewalls > are almost same in its performance. > Netscreen¡¯s Perofmance should be examined in the > real network, as it shows quite different > performance. > All of their products¡¯s performance are different > from what they advertise. > The Next Generation firewall is now on the way and > it is built based on the network processor. > Still SW based firewall works fine, ASIC Firewall is > wee bit better in its performance ( But, A LOT OF > LIMITS ), Network Processor Based Firewall show the > true wire speed regard less packet size. Although > Firewall -1 is old ,,,but its flexibility is quite > well designed. ( Incomparable) > And recognition of Check point is still there ( > Still King Of Firewall) ¡¦¡¦.. > > please don¡¯t be confuse to with brand name of > firewall¡¦.. wire speed is not what they says in > the paper and in the labs. > More question ¡¦Get more from the Web. FREE MSN > Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
