No, i'm talking about binding a proxy (lets take http-gw) to just the internal ip address, so that you can bind other proxies (that will act differently) on the outside interface (port 80/443 as an example again).
But like you said, its old an unsupported. --- Ben Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leaving aside the fact that 5.5NT is unsupported and > a version old, I > never had any problems getting basic proxy operation > to work. Are you > talking about binding to IP addresses that aren't > the same as the > external NIC of the box? > > If so, I really distantly recall that it might be a > (lack of) arp > response issue which could be worked around by > hardcoding the MAC > address of the other IP(s) in the gateway router. > Then again, it's a > long time since I've worked on or with a 5.5NT box > (for good reason!)... > > Cheers, > > -- > Ben Nagy > Network Security Specialist > Mb: +61 414 411 520 PGP Key ID: 0x1A86E304 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of bob bobing > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 12:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Gauntlet NAT issues > > > > > > 2. ok problem here. Gauntlet NT (and only NT) > can't > > bind proxies to ips. This really hoses the whole > proxy > > formula i think :). > [...] > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Firewalls mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
