On 9/4/06, Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:18:55AM +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > > Since the 'functions' builtin already prints all function definitions > > when writing 'functions' alone, you would need to change that one as > > well. > > functions -a lists all the functions, as does functions without > argument. one of those is redundant.
Not really. 'functions' lists all normal functions, while 'functions -a' also lists key bindings and hidden functions (those beginning with an underscore). Like 'ls' and 'ls -a'. > > in the name of consistensy the -a option to functions could be removed, > > greetings, martin. > -- > cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix > offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the world > -- > pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.org > unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at > administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.org > Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/ > -- Axel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
