On 11/09/2006, at 10:36 pm, Axel Liljencrantz wrote: > I'm not sure yet, but I'm > leaning towards including a function like that with fish, so that you > can simply issue a command like 'save_function foo' once the 'foo' > function works the way you want. Slightly more verbose, but less bloat > in the shell.
Good idea. And then why not make 'function -S foo bar' call 'function foo bar; save_function bar'? That would make it more discoverable, wouldn't it? Am I missing something? Jason ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
