On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Greg Reagle wrote: > That's very interesting. I get the same problem. I don't think > anything is wrong with your code. I think something fishy is going on > with fish, but I don't know what. It looks like it might even be a bug > in fish. I would expect test -n to be the opposite of test -z, but that > is not true sometimes.
You are correct; this behaviour is defined in POSIX.1-2008 which fish aims to comply with for the test command. `test -n "$SOMEVAR"` is the inverse of `test -z "$SOMEVAR"` - note the quotation marks which ensure there are two arguments. David Adam zanc...@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fish-users mailing list Fish-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fish-users
