Embed with the object tag and reference
filename.mxml.swf
Create as a html page in a browser not embedded
by referencing filename.mxml
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of jwc_wensan
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 2:07
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex
License(s) & Performance
Rob:
Does the SWF have to be embedded in the web page
or can it be
standalone?
Thanks,
Jack
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com,
"Rob Rusher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jack,
>
> You compile the SWF on a server with Flex
install. Then copy the
generated
> SWF over to your web server and embed it in a
web page.
>
> The difference is that you don't need a Java
Application Server
running.
> i.e. more system resources
>
> I'm not positive, but I think you need
special licensing
permission from MM
> to deploy a Flex app without the server.
>
> Regards,
> Rob Rusher
>
> Macromedia Certified Flex Instructor
> e:[EMAIL PROTECTED] c:303.885.7044 im:robrusher
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com]
On
> Behalf Of jwc_wensan
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:59 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex License(s)
& Performance
>
> Darron:
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> I read Ted's post. His production server does
not have Flex. Where
> is the SWF being served from?
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but if you need a flex
license for every
server
> the SWF sits on, what's the difference?
>
> Can you elaborate further?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Jack
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com,
"Darron J. Schall"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > jwc_wensan wrote:
> >
> > >With the above scenario how many
simultaneous users can
adequately
> > >access the server before I would
need a second server? Or is it
> > >better to ask how many per hour?
> > >
> > >
> > See Ted's entry here about scaling
Flex:
> > http://www.powersdk.com/ted/2005/05/scaling-flex.php
> >
> > I completely agree with him as
well. I don't have Flex running
on
> the
> > server at all. Instead, I take my
Flex-compiled .swf and place
it
> on a
> > "typical" web server.
Then, the Flex application is delivered
as
> a .swf
> > and there's no need for the server to do
any extra processing at
> all.
> > I've never had a server crash because it
couldn't send out .swf
> files
> > fast enough. Keep in mind though,
you'll need a Flex license
for
> every
> > server the .swf file sits on.
> >
> > You can use RemoteObjects without a Flex
server running as well,
> but
> > you'll need to use another AMF gateway
such as OpenAMF (or you
can
> use
> > ColdFusion). If you use
WebServices, you might need a little
shim
> > script to get around the security
restrictions of the Flash
Player
> > (loading data across domains), depending
on what server the web
> services
> > are located on.
> >
> > >Also, I read somewhere that
RemoteObjects is faster. Is it a
> > >signficant increase?
> > >
> > In general RemoteObjects are faster
because it uses AMF, which
is
> a
> > binary format and much less verbose than
WebServices. It's hard
> to give
> > a definite yes/no answer because I've
actually seen results go
> both ways...
> >
> > -d
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
