Yes, I agree, its bad design. The benefits of exposing tabs for browsing and then disabling them and forcing the user to follow some other route to navigate through the container makes no sense to me but I was just answering the poster’s initial question J

 


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Andrews
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:45 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] How can I block a TabNavigator ?

 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Deepa Subramaniam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 6:52 PM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] How can I block a TabNavigator ?

> What you can do is iterate through the TabNavigator's tabs and disable
> each of them. By disabling them, the change event will not get emitted.
> Use TabNavigator.getTabAt() and set the enabled property to false for
> each Tab.
>
> Now, when you disable a Tab, the Tab will assume the look of its
> disabled state (grayed out, etc). You probably want the Tab to look
> enabled even if it is disabled - in which case you'll have to change the
> Tab's disabledSkin.
>
> HTH -
> deepa

Horrors. It's really good making the user think (s)he can navigate the tabs,
then discover they can't. Is this really good practice?
Even with the disabled tabs - hey I completed the info, now it's become
invalid..

Paul

__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to