I don't think the installer works on Vista. I installed on XP and then
copied the installation directory over to my Vista machine. I think you
will also have to install the the player and debug version of the player
manually, by visiting the Adobe web site.

Iko


--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "realeyes_jun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Many developers are running Vista with Flex Builder - Including myself
> until I downgraded back to XP - so I don't think you encountering an
> issue with the Flex Builder setup program... sounds to me more like an
> issue with hardware. (Like the machine is having BSOD)
>
> I would double-check to make sure you have the most appropriate and up
> to date vid card drivers, bios firmware, vista patches. Also, running
> RAM diagnostics (I think there's a memory tester built into Vista) or
> disk check (cmdline chkdsk and/or vendor provided disk check tools)
> wouldn't hurt either. You might also want to check your Vista
> system/application logs to make sure you're not getting any errors
when
> you run the installer.
>
> Also, if you bought Flex Builder, I would think that Adobe has 30 days
> support or something? Just in case it turns out to be the setup
program
> which I think is not the case.
>
> -Jun
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "j_lentzz" jlentz@ wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a new machine that I just installed a full copy of Vista
> > Ultimate onto. I'm trying to install the latest Flex, but right
after
> > it finishes extracting the files, the machine reboots. I've tried
> > setting the installation program to XP SP2 compatibility and checked
> > run as administrator, but it still reboots the machine right after
the
> > files have been extracted. I've got Vista on my C drive and I'm
> > installing (at least trying to) Flex onto my F drive. Does anyone
> > have any ideas? One option I could do is to install XP first load
Flex
> > and then install Vista over it, but I'm not sure if that would help
> > any. Any ideas would be great.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
>



Reply via email to