Hi, We can consider doing this differently in the next release. In some respects the SDK is included in LCDS as a bonus because the WAR files have everything you need. But I realize that may not match up with your development model, so we can consider going back next time.
Matt --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "neale_patton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another unexplained change in the LCDS 2.5 ES release is the inclusion > of the Flex SDK as a zip file that requires extra (manual) effort to > install. Not only is that a pain it is also incomplete -- to have a > fully self-contained *Flex + LCDS* SDK you need to copy the fds.swc > (why didn't they rename that too?) from an exploded flex.war into your > unzipped Flex SDK directory. > > In the old version I just had to give the FDS Linux installer to our > build tools team and they could install it very simply. Now it looks > like I'm going to have to come up with a hacked-together install > package for them.. just extra effort for no real benefit as far as I > can see. > > Is there any reason why we can't go back to the FDS 2.0.x structure of > having a full Flex + FDS SDK as part of the installer? > > Cheers, > Neale. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Chotin" <mchotin@> wrote: > > > > Yes, the classes that we moved from rpc.swc into fds.swc were only > > supported by FDS anyway. But yes, the fact that it turned out their > > were inadvertent dependencies does make us question it after the fact > > :-) > > > > Matt > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Tom Chiverton > > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:51 AM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex HotFix 2 and Cairngorm 2.2 > > > > On Friday 25 May 2007, Alistair McLeod wrote: > > > HotFix 2 for Flex has been released, and as part of that release, some > > > > > classes have moved from the main SDK into FDS (eg, Consumer). > > > > Bwuh !?! I assume this is because the classes were only ever intended to > > be used by FDS-based applications ? > > > > But effectively dropping public classes in a minor point update can't be > > good, can it ? > > > > -- > > Tom Chiverton > > Helping to economically optimise front-end web-readiness > > on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com > > > > **************************************************** > > > > This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP. > > > > Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England > > and Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office > > address is at St James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF. A list > > of members is available for inspection at the registered office. Any > > reference to a partner in relation to Halliwells LLP means a member of > > Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law Society. > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY > > > > This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and > > may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the addressee > > you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor > > copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee > > of its existence or contents. If you have received this email in error > > please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 > > 8008. > > > > For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com. > > > > > > > > -- > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > Search Archives: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
