Hello again, I have read more Flex documentation, and found a lot of good information regarding the remote objects and the environment, but I have a thought about making a change in the structure of the Flex application, have someone tried to take a module and put it into a sql database as a bytearray, and bring it to the application as remote object and connect module loader to the DTO, is possible to connect the module loader to the byteArray?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Schmalle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll Chime in on this since.. I could call myself a professional component > developer. > > I had the same worries about source and intellectual property (2 years ago). > What I have found in the real component market, > developers will buy your component without code IF you have a site and > support backing up your claim of a purely 'encapsulated' API. > > Now what I have learned; Mind you I have been developing components since > Flash 5 :) > > - Source code IS love but, they are going to pay a lot more for it. I'm > talking about my frameworks coming up that are definite jewels for the > professional/enterprise flex developer. > > I will have to options SWC or SWC/with source. You can't stop people from > riping off your stuff. There are ticks and leaches in the REAL world as > well. The trick, is to be the leader and innovator. I have survived 2 years > without selling source. I have created a brand new framework that I am very > proud of, documented great and I will be selling my components with source. > > Anyway, ramble but... you will always get decompiled and don't kid yourself. > > Peace, > Mike > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Josh McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I still can't see what you hope to achieve with these solutions? Anybody > > willing to copy and paste your code, is just as willing to copy your > > encrypted .SWC file. > > > > Source code is like love - it only has value if you give it out. > > > > -Josh > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Cato Paus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hello again everyone, how can we protect our code? > >> > >> How should we go forward in order to protect the methods used to change > >> the senistive information on user data, some blogs on this? > >> > >> I found one at a remote-finfig.xml and the use of session id > >> > >> > >> http://www.flexpasta.com/index.php/2008/03/18/flex-using-blazeds- with-java-do-you-care-about-security/ > >> this is good to have this thread hope we can work together to find out of > >> this :) > >> > >> > >> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "jmfillman" <jmfillman@> wrote: > >> > > >> > Has anyone had experience using SWC Encrypt 2.0, by Amayeta? Does it > >> > work, or would I just be wasting my money? I'm trying to protect a > >> > component I plan to sell, but given the prevalence of de- compilers, I'm > >> > hesitant to release it. I don't want to see all my hard work stolen. > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > > Teoti Graphix Blog > http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com > > You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'. >
