I second the motion! On 9/20/06 12:40 PM, "Tim Ellison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote is to expend the programming effort on the new console and only > consider the Multi-RX enhancements that are "low hanging fruit" for > inclusion in the 1.x console. > > > > > -Tim > --- > Integrated Technical Services > > "Too much of everything is just enough." > -Rob Barlow > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:37 PM > To: 'A.R.S. - W5AMI'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Feature Request List > > The simple SubRX with same mode and filter was not too difficult to > implement thanks to the facilities that Bob and Frank provided (a LONG > time ago!). However, the code is nowhere near ready for individual > modes/filters/other settings. And to add them would be a fair amount of > work. I'll be honest....we may never have those options in this > console. > > One of the major reasons for adopting the new architecture is to address > this particular problem (data model -- removed from GUI). It is being > built in such a way that this is no-brainer. To build it into the > current console would be at least 2x work at best undoing our current > source code data model. All of this is to say that you may have to wait > until the new console for more Multi-RX functionality. > > > Eric Wachsmann > FlexRadio Systems > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> radio.biz] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - W5AMI >> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 11:24 AM >> To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz >> Subject: [Flexradio] Feature Request List >> >> I noticed today that I can delete my requests in the "Feature Request" >> system. Two requests I made a while back have been implemented on the > >> new SVN so I decided to delete them so not to clutter the request >> list. I don't know if this is exactly the proper procedure. Being a >> programmer myself, I know how version control, clutter and other >> things can add to my confusion and daily hair pulling. >> >> Eric, would it help for us users to go back and delete these requests >> we made if said request has been implemented? >> >> By the way, I am very pleased with the new sub rx and other things in >> 683! Wonder if there is any way to allow cross mode listening. Say >> AM on the main and LSB on the sub? I know, one thing at a time....;) >> >> >> Brian w5ami >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FlexRadio mailing list >> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz >> Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ >> FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com > > > _______________________________________________ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com > > _______________________________________________ > FlexRadio mailing list > FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz > Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ > FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com > _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
