I don't think we are the only ones that lost VAC capability. But I do think there are a very small number of digital contester/dxers (relatively speaking) using the SVN's.
When in a contest, I prefer to use the rock solid v1.10.2 Same for DXing. I just use the SVN's for 'learning' realy. Yes, if you use the panadaptor to it's fullest, it can really give you an advantage. Careful placement of your transmitted signal is more important than power. ----- Original Message ----- From: "N3WT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FireBrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 8:39 PM Subject: RE: VAC and SVN 1597 > Good one! Congrats on rtty. I worked 3B7C twice on cw only. Thanks to > the panadapter , as you know. > > Since there has not been anyone but you saying anything about the VAC and > the latest SVN, I was thinking it was maybe just you and I with the > problem. > I'm sure it will get going again. Expect the Flex 5000 here by Friday > or > Monday. > > 73 N3WT > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: FireBrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: VAC and SVN 1597 > > But with the reverted vesion, I was able to work 3B7C on 30 rtty.... > so it wasn't a big deal. lol > > On 9/19/2007 8:26:11 PM, N3WT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Bill, >> >> Were you ever able to get VAC to work under the latest SVN? I have to >> revert back to SVN 1586. >> >> John, N3WT > > _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
