> Hi guys. > > ... > > Having had a quick look at it again, here are the results > 172 flying JSB looks bad. > 310 flying JSB looks bad. > 310 flying YAsim looks fine. > Hunter flying YAsim looks fine... > > But we know (well, sounds like you guys are happy) that the JSB > on its own is fine. > > So where do we go from here?
Try to output data using the JSBSim data logging feature and see if that data looks any better to you. I've already checked that out and it seems to be OK. Just to be clear: P, Q, R, are body rates, phi, theta, psi are euler angles relative to the local frame (X positive north and parallel to local horizontal, Y positive east and parallel to local horizontal, and Z positive down). At rest on the runway P, Q, R are zero, and phidot, thetadot, and psidot are zero. If you'd like to look at the code in JSBSim, look at FGPropagate::Run() in FGPropagate.cpp. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
