On Saturday 21 July 2007 21:26, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > Has the recent addition of the Nasal Air-to-air refueling capability broken > the one that's been in JSBSim for a long time? If so, I propose that the > new capability using Nasal should be made compatible with the one that was > already there to begin with - meaning, it should not break the JSBSim one.
The T38 error that was posted here refers to an error in the T38's aar.nas file (notice, it's ALREADY using nasal AAR), which hasn't kept pace with the rest of the changes in FG (which is admittedly a pretty rapid one, at times.) The good news is that it's probably redundant, anyway. In the reasonably recent past, a generic nasal AAR script which supports both JSBSim and YASim aircraft has been developed, which supports refuelling from both AI and MP aircraft. All one has to do is to include it in the aircraft -set.xml, as previously mentioned. As previously mentioned this can be simply ignored, or if aircraft-specific features are desired, any aircraft can maintain a local copy, modified to suit. Obviously, using the generic one has the huge advantage that someone else will ensure it stays up to date ;-) As far as I can see, there isn't a problem. JSBSim aircraft refuel just as nicely as YASim ones. The AAR capability in FG once only supported JSBSim refuelling from AI tankers, now it's vastly more flexible. Seems to be a win all round, to me... Anyone is free to burst my happy bubble with proof to the contrary though :-) Cheers, AJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
