Am Sonntag 23 September 2007 schrieb Tim Moore: > K. Hoercher wrote: > > On 9/18/07, Csaba Halász <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks for reporting this. > >> I think it would be better to explicitly check for "runway" type > >> instead of checking for "not taxiway". Any comments? > > > > Whatever you see fit. > > I checked in the fix using == "runway", as suggested by Csaba, but if > anyone encounters the problems about which you speculate below we'll > revisit the issue.
Given that only the labels 'runway' and 'taxiway' are assigned in FGRunwaysList::add this simple check should be ok. Note that it is now no longer possible to get taxiways out of the runway DB. Don't know whether this affects some instruments (KLN89, mk_viii, ....) as they loop over runways/taxiways. Independent of this issue I'm currently revising the runway code putting unit tests to it anyway. Thomas -- PhD Student, Dept. Animal Physiology, HU Berlin Tel +49 30 2093 6173, Fax +49 30 2093 6375 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
