Willie,

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:14:28PM +0000, Willie Fleming wrote:
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=Talk:FGCOM
> 
> Ive kicked this off with a request for _simplex_ comms and a wee moan about 
> voice quality.
> 
> I used squawkBox once a couple of years back - I cant honestly remeber how 
> the 

Ok, but I see many things that should be solved at the same time. We
should create a list og topics to be done and we should try to give them
priorities and perhaps name who try to solve these topics. But where to
place this list? FG-Wiki? My own Wiki?

> voice quality sounded. Can anyoine enlighten me? How realistic does it sound?
> The ATC chatter we have is pretty realistic - obviously recorded by someone 
> with a newish scanner somewhere near Heathrow EGLL - in terms of volume 
> quality and random spurious noises and clicks -  note the variations in 
> perceived volume of the different calling stations.  These aircraft however 
> are all commercial operations, the radios found in GA aircraft will in some 
> cases sound a bit rougher.

I see the following realism problems:

1.) absence of random white noise
2.) the voice channels should be limited with a high cut (at 4 kHz) (or an band
pass between 300 Hz and 4 KHz)
3.) as in real life there should be a mechanism for realising
crosstalking (e.g. the sender with the maximum of output pushes other
senders in the background)
4.) real com radios have an automatic noise limiter (squelch) which
makes a little noise after releasing the PTT key.
5.) pilots have engine sounds in the background

Here are my ideas:
1.) A daemon in the background ca radomly place short samples of white
noise and/or athmospherical noise an used channels. The problem is that
crosstalking cannot be recognized from such a daemon (see 4).
2.) Perhaps an EQ in the sound chain. The best place would be iaxclient.
But also ALSA would be working - but this is not real protable.
3.) That's a real problem. If this should work something like a complete
new conference module for asterisk must be developed __AND___ a
mechanism (schedular) for the voice clients (perhaps a simple FIFO). Not
as easy as it sounds...
4.) Why not sending a simple short noise sample after muting the mic?
This could be placed inside iaxclient.
5.) Again: mixing engine sound inside the mic stream... perhaps also at
iaxclient?

What I see: Everything is more a sound/VoIP problem rather than a FG
problem... 

> Please note -- Im used to hearing ATC chatter in the UK --probably a LOT 
> different in the rest of Europe and the US. I don't know how the ATC chatter 
> we have sounds to the rest of you guys both in terms of content and quality.

I tried to follow some web ATC streams and I udnerstand nearly nothing -
especially the pilots are very difficult to understand.
:-)

Regards, Holger

-- 
#####  #### ##  ##   Holger Wirtz         Phone : (+49 30) 884299-40
##  ## ##   ### ##   DFN-Verein           Fax   : (+49 30) 884299-70
##  ## #### ######   Stresemannstr. 78    E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##  ## ##   ## ###   10963 Berlin
#####  ##   ##  ##   GERMANY              WWW   : http://www.dfn.de
GPG-Fingerprint: ABFA 1F51 DD8D 503C 85DC  0C51 E961 79E2 6685 9BCF

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to