--- David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like we're almost there with the surface > positions. JSBSim > and YASim are using the following properties, > apparently in the same > way: > > /surface-positions/elevator-pos-norm > /surface-positions/flap-pos-norm > /surface-positions/left-aileron-pos-norm > /surface-positions/right-aileron-pos-norm > /surface-positions/rudder-pos-norm > > There is what might be a JSBSim config-file error > for the C310: when > the ailerons are centered, JSBSim reports > /surface-positions/right-aileron-pos-norm at > -.677422, which is > clearly wrong; the problem does not occur for the > C172.
David, Have a look at c172.xml, you will need to add a right aileron FCS component to c310.xml > > The only inconsistency left is gear position: > > JSBSim: /gear/gear[n]/position > YASim: /gear/gear[n]/position-norm > > They both agree on using 1.0 for down and 0.0 for > up, though, and > that's good news. As soon as this last problem is > fixed, I'll switch > the animations over and we'll have smooth flap and > gear movement. In > fact, if the FDM people want to get really clever, > they can have the > gear retract and extend slightly out of sync so that > they lock up or > down about .5 sec apart. > > > All the best, > > > David > > -- > David Megginson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
