* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Curtis L. Olson) [2002.04.19 21:24]:
> Anyone up for a 0.7.10 release sometime soon?  If anyone wants a real
> time wasting discussion, what do people think about switching from
> 0.7.10, 0.7.11, 0.7.12, etc. to going 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
> that way it looks like our development is moving at 10x the speed.  Or
> perhaps I should say that our current number scheme makes the
> development look like it is proceeding at 0.1x the speed it actually
> is. :-)

What exactly do we want 1.0 to be?  Here are some things I'd like to see
in 1.0:

- Runway lighting
- Sane gear model in JSBSim
- Turbine engine model in JSBSim
- Complete c172 (fully functional 2D/3D models)

Wouldn't that create a usable flight simulator for many people?  Thanks
-- 
Cameron Moore
/ Why do people without a watch look at their \
\   wrist when you ask them what time it is?  /

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to