I'm under the impression that an aircraft should be able to glide
sensibly up to the stall and then you may encounter problems depending
on the type of the wing, where the stall will occur on the wing and
whether it will occur on both wings together.

A prop driven a/c may give additional benefits to the airflow over the
wing.

Essentially the aircraft should be dynamically stable up to the stall
and offer some degree of predictability in the stall (not necessarily
control).

Here's my challenge to you...

Take the dc3 up to 5000' and cut engines whilst cruising.  Without
paying any attention to maintaining altitude, make some shallow turns
and try to glide around for a while then try and land the plane once you
get the feel for it.

I fail to do this.  I get an apparent stall, randomly, like one wing is
stalling before the other. I wiggle the rudder a little and wait for the
a/c to come back to me (not sure this has the desired effect).  When it
comes back it's alright for a while, then starts again.  This might be
argued is the effect of the no power condition. It might be argued my
incidence is to great for the airspeed.  I tried the same thing at a
lower incidence and noticed similar results.

Last time I talked of the dc3 I was saying how it had stability problems
on takeoff, now I have stability problems in the air.  Does anyone else
fly this plane?  Where does the data come from for this aircraft
configuration?

The other thing I was wondering about was the way static and dynamic
stability is handled by the fdm.  Is it the case that while gear is in
contact with the ground the fdm combines the effect of static and
dynamic stability, adjusting as the tail wheel (or nose) lifts and as
main gear departs removing everything but drag?  Is ground effect
modelled?  Where can I look at this code - I would like to see how it is
done.  (I'll be browsing my CVS while you reply - looking for it)

Chris




_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to