On Dienstag, 23. März 2004 11:34, Jon Berndt wrote: > It wouldn't be a requirement - to store JSBSim aircraft at the JSBSim web > site - I'm not even sure it would really need to be in CVS (I hadn't > thought of that part, yet). But, it just seems to make sense that there > ought to be a central repository for JSBSim aircraft (and where better than > the JSBSim site?), and installation ought to be very simple. It is also > envisioned the site/page would provide information on using the aircraft, > and perhaps other useful stuff, as well. Dave Culp raised this idea the > other day - he already has a "hangar" here: > > http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/hangar/hangar.html > > I don't want to interfere with the FlightGear base directory storage, > however, there appears to be coming a time when maybe the base package > needs to be culled of some aircraft models - at least eventually the number > of aircraft modeled will become so large that it's just not feasible or > desirable to hold all of them in the base package. I think the hangar > approach is a good one.
I was just asking. I am looking forward to a new hangar tab on the JSBSim web page. ;-) And I might have a candidate for this in the near future ... Models in cvs will be a good idea I think. The are partialy already in JSBSims CVS. At least the aerodynamic tables and the engines are there. Maintaining an aircraft as a whole on one cvs server is better than spreading parts of the configuration over several cvs servers. If we do so, we might think about our current JSBSim directory structure a bit, but that's OT here. Greetings Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel