On Thursday 13 October 2005 01:13 pm, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > Is it a priority to have a voice comm at the moment? A voice comm would > serve no purpose if there is no one being the ATC. > > I think we should focus on text-based ATC first. With text, it would be > much more easier to create an automatic ATC. We can always expand it to > include some sort of speech-to-text engine later on.
This sounds good to me. Voice-ATC in the real world is a dying technology anyway. In a few years it will be gone and replaced by data-link, at least for commercial flying. I do think, however, that plane-2-plane comm at the multiplayer arena is a good idea. Dave _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
