On Friday 07 April 2006 07:56, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Lee Elliott -- Friday 07 April 2006 00:31: > > now all we need from everyone else is a decision on > > 'agl-hold' vs. 'terrain-follow'. > > Okay. I flipped a coin, and agl-hold won! :-P > > No, seriously: If nobody objects I will tomorrow switch all > remaining occurrences of terrain-follow to agl-hold in generic > FlightGear files (but not in maintained aircraft, unless the > maintainer wishes so). Rationale: > > - $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/Generic/generic-autopilot.xml uses > agl-hold - $FG_ROOT/gui/dialogs/autopilot.xml uses agl-hold > (and did before my changes) - all /autopilot/locks/altitude > options end with "-hold". (all heading options, too, except > "wing-leveler", which is understandable) > > Only $FG_ROOT/keyboard.xml and these aircraft use > "terrain-follow" in at least one *.nas or *.xml file: > > - AN-225 > - BAC-TSR2 > - A-10 > - B-52F > - YF-23 > - seahawk > - MiG-15 > - TU-114 > - Hunter > - CanberraBI8 > > m.
Apart from the Hunter, which Vivian did, and the seahawk, which Vivian has done a lot of work on, the others were all done by me. A simple search & replace on 'terrain-follow' /should/ work but will result in some funny property node names. I'll go through them manually and get updates out. Vivian: do you want to do the seahawk or shall I? I guess we need to rationalise the seahawk anyway. LeeE ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
