Heiko Schulz wrote: >I mean not to stop the work on OSG - far from it! > >But if we want FlightGear and OSG to get better we >need users - and we get them only with a next release. > > > With OSG in the state it's in, we can't go testing it on the users. If we did, we won't *have* any users before too long!
>The currently version is a good one with very few >bugs. >There are much improvements done since april. For me >important: framerates are stable, the helicopter fdm >is more realistic than MSFS's, nice route manager >(could be the cutting edge for a FMS)- every day I'm >flying with FG I got more fun. > >I would vote for a next release - a pre-OSG release! >;-) > > > Agreed, a release of all the things that are working, but for now at least, no OSG. I don't know what Curt uses as a metric for deciding if a new release should happen, but the time delay between the current 'stable' and the previous one was about two years - too long I'm sure. People out there start assuming that a project is *dead* if it doesn't release new versions within living memory! Having said that, getting a release together is hard work for the team. It shouldn't be done unless there's a good reason. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
