Martin Spott wrote: >Hi Jim, > >Jim Campbell wrote: > > > >>Some discussions have already taken place on JSBsim devel mailing list >>regards communication between "modules" of flightgear. >> >> > >Indeed, the idea of cutting FlightGear into modules is not a new one >and has been floating around way before this nice "new arcitecture" >paper came up that everybody takes as a reference. > >Using some sort of networked database is a nice start and definitely >honours the idea of portability - yet I don't see such thing that is >capable of handling data at a rate that meets the requirements of >FlightGear. OpenLDAP as well as MySQL are very bad at handling a high >rate of concurrent read/write requests - they miss the target by a huge >distance, they both are faaar to complex (even MySQL :-) for such a >task. > >Personally I think some thing like distributed shared memory might fill >the gap. I've been doing some literature research on this topic several >years ago, the idea looks pretty promising and different OpenSource >implementations already have been around by that time - but I would not >like to be the one to debug such a tricky beast .... :-) > >Cheers, > Martin. > > One should not forget that FG has allready some networking capacity. This alone has allready allowed ppl to split fdm and rendering on several machines. Perhaps there is something to reuse here.
Harald. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
