Melchior FRANZ wrote
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] wxradar bug fix and
> added feature
>
>
> * Csaba Halász -- Sunday 09 December 2007:
> > Any ideas? Should we put in a comma-separated list of
> symbolic names?
>
> Not comma, but yes, I think that's the best thing. There
> should IMHO already be a name/number list in AIBase.hxx. Then
> the property could do what we do with logging classes:
>
> /sim/logging/classes {STRING} = terrain|astro|flight|input|gl[...]
>
> Of course, these names can also change between releases, but
> they are at least readable and consistent in all of fgfs. The
> question is, should there be shared flags, as in:
>
> { "ship", 0x0001, }
> { "aircraft", 0x0002, }
> { "seaplane", 0x0003, } // ship and aircraft?
> { "carrier", 0x0005, }
>
> I wouldn't mind committing your patch as a temporary
> solution, if you want to make sure that the functionality is
> in the release. But I think this should be fixed in the long run.
>
I'm not cleat what type of radar we are modelling that can distinguish
between ships and carriers or seaplanes and aircraft, or even want to. There
are radars which can distinguish between carrier/ships and
seaplanes/aircraft. Mind you I have spent even less time than anyone
thinking about this. So far.
Vivian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
