Tim Moore wrote: > To add my two cents: > I mostly favor putting "using" declarations at the top of source files > instead > of using namespace qualifiers in the code. On the other hand, I would > probably > use the namespace qualifer explicitly if the symbol in question is somewhat > obscure, to give the reader a clue about its source. For example, I'd never > type > std::string in code, but would probably type std::nth_element. > > A middle ground, considered the best C++ style by many, is to explicitly use > only the symbols you are referencing from a namespace, instead of using the > whole namespace. This is a style and taste issue, best left to the individual > developer and circumstances. Personally, I have typed "using namespace osg;" > almost everywhere that there is a reference to Open Scene Graph symbols > because > there is a tendency to use many symbols from that namespace at once, but my > thinking is now leaning towards explicit "using" declarations for individual > symbols instead.
This is pretty much in line with the rest, excellent. Just a note to the developers, this is *not* a regulation but rather a guideline. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
