On 25 Aug 2008, at 07:31, Melchior FRANZ wrote:

> I just made all internal runway data available in the Nasal query
> function, without considering any possible use case. So far I only
> used those elements that I needed for finding the touchdown point
> ($FG_ROOT/Nasal/glide_slope_tunnel.nas). Generally, the more  
> information
> is available, the better. One never knows what clever stuff people
> come up with, given even obscure data.

Ah, thanks for the pointer to the nasal file, and the explanation of  
the code. Absolutely agreed that making as much data as possible  
available is valuable - as you say, I'm always amazed by the neat  
things people do in nasal scripts.

> But then again, we certainly don't need any of the runway details from
> an airport that's thousands of kilometers away. I'd be fine with  
> having
> some pieces of information in a file that's automatically(?) loaded  
> with
> the tile, and can additionally get loaded via Nasal IO on demand, even
> for very distant airports.

Yep, I'm still thinking on different ways to make the core datasets a  
bit more 'lazy'.

James


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to