Yes, I will be obliged to check the value to avoid the instrument fix in some cases. But as I discover this problem I wanted to try a solution for every dialog-apply, to make the listeners work as expected, for future uses, not only the failures system I'm trying to write.
If the fix is rejected, that's not a problem for me, but I think we let a problem that can go out again some day... regards seb Csaba Halász a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Melchior FRANZ <mfr...@aon.at> wrote: >> setlistener(f ~ "/serviceable", failure[f], 0, 0); >> >> 0 ... trigger on change only > > As I wrote in my other email, this doesn't work as expected. The > listener is triggered initially even if the property doesn't change. > > Sébastien, I think your listeners should check the value of the > property. It might very well happen that a failed instrument is later > fixed, can't it? So the listeners would get triggered again and you'd > have to differentiate between failure and fixing. This would also make > the dialog-apply problem go away. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
