Tim Moore wrote: > I mostly agree with this, though I continue to maintain that the new types > are fully in the spirit of the property system, moreso than array types would > be. I'd also suggest that no one here knows the right answer to this question, > making the option of playing with the new features in a "playground off to the > side" attractive.
After reading the proposal I'm starting to get comfortable with it; add the support code but don't use it anywhere but in configuration file parsing code (where the properties don't end up in the main property tree). Such a case seems perfectly acceptable to me and seems to solve most (if not all) arguments I've seen against including it. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
