On 10.04.2011 15:02, Geoff McLane wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 14:34 +0200, ThorstenB wrote: >>> As far as I am aware we can _NOT_ presently use >>> later that OSG-2.9.9 ;=(( >> Yes, we can. > Huh? Then WHY does Arnt have a LINK problem with OSG-2.9.11? I don't know. The error Arndt is seeing is a _linker_ error - not a compile error. Csaba has already given the reason in his earlier email: mismatching OSG header and library files (messed up local installation). Another possibility is an incomplete build after changing the OSG version (run "make clean" in sg/fg). In any case, that's not "our" fault. If sg/fg wasn't adapted to the OSG version, you would get a _compile_ error - not a linker one.
> Yes, I know it can take 'some days', and no criticism > is intended, but 2.9.10, the first after 2.9.9 was released > 3rd December, 2010, and others 2.9.11, etc later... maybe you > meant 'some MONTHS' ;=)) No. > Both Brisa's and my script use 2.8.3 or 2.9.9, but have > a switch for 'trunk', and would code for later if workable... No. After getting lots of reports and complaints due to OSG-trunk issues, we changed the Brisa's script to stop using OSG trunk: http://www.gitorious.org/fg/fgmeta/blobs/master/download_and_compile.sh > When you suggest Hudson is using OSG-svn - If _NOT_ trunk > then exactly which version of OSG-svn is used by Hudson? "OSG trunk" = "OSG svn". It's compiling (and linking) fine. cheers, Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
