Vivian: > We also note that you are back to using the .png textures with their > black > edges etc., rather than the .dds that we provided. Use of .dds textures > should at least be no worse than .png and at best will provide a small > performance advantage.
That's a technical requirement of Stuart's system, no intentional step: Textures have to be arranged in regular m x n structures on the sheet. I don't think I have seen dds textures from you with this structure. What I used earlier and what you converted to dds where textures associated with a model which supported any arrangement of textures on the sheet. The dds couldn't be used, and I needed everything in m x n sheets in a hurry - Emilian at some point offered help for the transition in the forum, but that apparently got lost on the way. My original intention was that the texture sheets get completely reworked and replaced by better quality imagery where possible, then converted to dds while the current sheets are to be used for a transition period only. But evidence suggests that that period may be longer than expected... So again, there is no intention to disregard your conversion work involved here - sorry if that impression was created. * Thorsten ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
