On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Patrick Callahan wrote: > What can be said about the flight dynamics of the C172P model? > Is it accurate? If not, how could it be improved?
It's currently got a "3" rating. It matches some of the PoH numbers (cruise speed, rate of climb) for an aircraft fitted with a cruise prop rather than a climb prop. IIRC the stall is too low and the slide-slip behaviour is incorrect. Certainly the FDM would benefit from some TLC, but it requires someone with a bit of JSBSim knowledge, or the time to learn, and ideally someone with some time in the 172 who can compare it to the real thing. The two people don't necessarily have to be the same person, though they'd probably have to work quite closely together. -Stuart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
