castle...@comcast.net wrote: > Multi-core machines have been around for some time now. Perhaps it is > time to think beyond running Flighgear as a monolithic process in a > single CPU configuration.
As a start you may want to visit: http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg30433.html As far as I can tell, splitting the monolithic process is steadily getting more difficult (despite the fact that almost everybody would like to see improved multi-core support), because recent eye-candy development relies on having a monolithic FlightGear - and eye-candy is attracting flies .... Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
