Le dimanche 11 décembre 2005 à 09:45 +1000, Chris Wilkinson a écrit : > Hi there, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Today's Topics: > > 3. Re: Re: Clouds 2D better than Clouds 3D (Gerard ROBIN) > > (Gerard ROBIN) > > Hi Gerard. The 2D shot is better in that instance because there > *are* some clouds. I wonder if the metar data in your location > is broken? I unplug DSL here due to frequent storms when not using > the PC, and if I forget to plug it back in before starting fgfs I > get the same with 3D clouds... > > > Thanks for the answer,
No problem about DSL connection, i can check it in real time because of an other permanent connection on Metar (which makes me to insist on the better results of 2DClouds). It is a problem into FG itself, and because i do not hope any answer which will solve the Bug, i am making some patch in my FG to solve it on my side , up to the developer to solve the error on their side. If they want. Cheers -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-users mailing list Flightgear-users@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
