> > To my knowledge Ginsberg was never part of Fluxus the only beat who was
> 
> So was Nauman, so what ?

>From this Al Hanson catalogue, I got the impression that the most
important time of "fluxus" was the time before the coining of the label,
immediately after the Cage class. So who was a "fluxus" member then ? And
how important is this label etc.. ? 

IMHO, might be wrong, "fluxus" members werent the only "fluxish" people.
"fluxus" was just a part of pop. "fluxus" philosophy was just a part of
pop philosophy. See the artists in "pop architecture", I know that Higgins
was VERY proud, that he had made this book, it wasnt "fluxus
architecture"...With Richard Hamilton on the cover....who wasnt less
"fluxish" than Beuys, who...but this is another story.

Heiko

Reply via email to