Got it. Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima <yoshiki.ohsh...@acm.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Casey Ransberger
> <casey.obrie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Didn't know this term, and worrying that I was completely
> misunderstanding
> > the use of the term "behavior," I googled and found these:
> >
> > http://conal.net/papers/icfp97/
> >
> >
> http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/genuinely-functional-guis.pdf
> >
> > There's a Wikipedia article, but it's very sparse. Anything else I should
> > read?
>
> Yes, I think it is unfortunate that they picked the term "behavior" to
> mean "continuous time-varying entity".  A generic term "behavior" does
> not have the connotation of "continuous", as far as I can tell.
>
> To me, the Flapjax paper and their tutorial are more "intuitive"
> (whatever that means)
>
> http://www.flapjax-lang.org/publications/
>
> --
> -- Yoshiki
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> fonc@vpri.org
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>



-- 
Casey Ransberger
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to