>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> I'm more interested in discovering whether the existing fonts
Keith> used for MathML include these [adobe recomended] glyph names so
Probably not. The (postscript versions of the) interesting math fonts
I beleive all predate adobe's glyph naming recomendations. (At least
for the TeX-related ones; I cannot speak definitively on mozilla's
other set of recomended math fonts (by bitstream for corel, yes?).)
If you have a full tetex install, check out eg:
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmmi10.pfb
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/bluesky/cm/cmsy10.pfb
with t1disasm to get the glyph names. Another interesting example are
the lucida math fonts. The afms are included in tetex in:
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/afm/yandy/lumath/
None of the glyphs in these fonts which are in unicode but not in
adobe's glyphlist.txt follow the uniXXXX or uXXXXXX name format.
Even some of the glyphs which are in glyphlist.txt may not have the
same name as adobe recommends.
For the (type1) math fonts you will need font-specific glyphname to
unicode codepoint tables. Even the ttf versions of these fonts will
probably need such a table. It would presumably be useful were these
tables in text files a la the enc files used by X for server-side
fonts or by TeX-related utilities such as dvips, et al.
-JimC
_______________________________________________
Fonts mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
