On 20.08.2008 15:40:08 Max Berger wrote: > Dear Fop-Devs, > > I hope this commit does not break gump - if so I'll revert it.
No, we'll try to fix the Gump run first! This is useful after all. I'll look into the Gump descriptor right away to avoid any problems I can fix before the next run. > What this does: If you set properties to point to a java 1.4 > installation, it will try to verify if fop uses only the classes > available there and output a warning. > > The retroweaving process is currently done but unsused (unfortunately it > cannot be turned of, so it just weaves to a temp directory) - so no 1.5 > features are available. Experiments in separate branches are welcome > (result of the discussion we had previously on that matter). > > As a note of success: I found two cases of "valueOf" in the code, (see > my commit 687323) which slipped in there accidentally. > > Should this prove successfully I would like to > - make the warning bigger > - add a note that committers *should* have jdk 1.4 installed +1 but probably not necessary if we can make the verification work in Gump. If someone messes up, we'll know it within a few hours at most. <snip/> Jeremias Maerki
