David, the reason for the problem is a vertical overflow in the static-content.
Log output: WARNING: static-content overflows the available area. (fo:static-content, "Header1, Header2") It's always a good idea to look at warnings on the log even if they may seem unrelated. You can also see now why just posting a snippet is sometimes not enough. Always post complete examples because the actual problem could lie elsewhere. So, if you increase the extent for region-before, the problem vanishes. There's no real bug. It could be said however, that some of the code in StaticContentLayoutManager and ListItemLayoutManager could probably be improved a little to avoid these somewhat strange results. Some technical background for those interested as to why the problem manifested itself as it did: Since the content in static-content overflows, it is broken into two parts by the breaker (same code as for page breaking). The StaticContentLayoutManager renders the second part right under the first. Since the breakpoint is between the block 1 and block 2 in the item-body, the block 2 is rendered as part of the second part. It could be said that the StaticContent should probably not render the generated parts but rather the whole sequence in case of an overflow. Furthermore, we could try to find out why the ListItemLayoutManager did not combine block 1 and block2 as the element list from the label should not allow breaking these two apart (because of the image's height). On 08.06.2006 20:17:48 David P. Nesbitt wrote: > Jeremias, > > I think the three enclosed files demonstrate what I am > seeing. Please place them in the same directory and > run the following command: > > fop -xml Test.xml -xsl Test.xsl -pdf Test.pdf > > You will see the behavior that I described earlier (I > hope). Namely: > > --------------------- > |item-body (block 1)| > --------------------- > ------------ > |item-label| > ------------ > --------------------- > |item-body (block 2)| > --------------------- > > Interestingly, if you change the "change-me" variable > from '1.56in' to '1.57in', I think you will see the > following behavior: > > --------------------- > |item-body (block 1)| > --------------------- > ------------ --------------------- > |item-label| |item-body (block 2)| > ------------ --------------------- > > Is that what you would expect? I would expect the > following: > > ------------ --------------------- > |item-label| |item-body (block 1)| > ------------ --------------------- > --------------------- > |item-body (block 2)| > --------------------- > > Is there a way to get my expected behavior? > > Thanks again for your assistance. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It could, yes, especially since I can't reproduce > > it. Maybe if you have > > a full, scaled-down FO file that demonstrates it. > > Maybe your snippet is > > just not enough to demonstrate what's going on. > > > > On 06.06.2006 18:15:26 David P. Nesbitt wrote: > > > Jeremias, > > > > > > Thanks for the assistance. Would it help if I > > > provided the generated PDF? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dave > > > > > > --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, I don't see the effect you describe. The > > > > snippet renders as I would > > > > expect. > > > > > > > > On 06.06.2006 04:38:52 David P. Nesbitt wrote: > > > > > The formatting of list-item has seemed to have > > > > changed > > > > > from 0.20.5 to 0.92. I have a list item (code > > > > > contained below) that is rending as follows in > > > > 0.92: > > > > > > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > |item-body (block 1)| > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > ------------ > > > > > |item-label| > > > > > ------------ > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > |item-body (block 2)| > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > > > > > > Here is what I am expecting and how 0.20.5 > > seemed > > > > to > > > > > work (unless something else in the port is > > causing > > > > > this changed behavior): > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------------------- > > > > > |item-label| |item-body (block 1)| > > > > > ------------ --------------------- > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > |item-body (block 2)| > > > > > --------------------- > > > > > > > > > > How can I get my desired behavior in 0.92? > > <snip/> > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
