On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 07:33:55AM +0200, Gour wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:21:06 -0600 > Chad Perrin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > First . . . I misspoke. It was lighttpd that I was thinking of using, > > not thttpd. > > > > Second . . . Hiawatha doesn't meet my requirements for any project in > > which I've considered various webserver options, so I've never used > > it, so I for one don't really have much to say on the subject. > > That's interesting, I'm just curious what do you find missing in > Hiawatha to consider lighttpd instead?
My requirements tend to include one of two of the following: 1. Apache. Sometimes, for some reason, Apache is all that will do. 2. Lightweight and copyfree licensed. Hiawatha is distributed under the terms of the GPLv2, which is a copyleft license, not a copyfree license. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
