On Thursday, December 03, 2015 9:48 AM, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Andy Gibbs on Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:56:42 +0100:

For reference, a single commit may lead to around 100 "round-trips" to
then sync with the server (assuming no commits coming back as well).

If you  are using autosync (the  default) then Fossill will  first pull,
before it pushes. Are these the ``round-trips'' you mean? If so, what is
more  important to  know is  how many  round-trips are  made during  the
``push''  synchronization  part  of  the autosync.  Though,  again,  the
max-download may have just been a  red-herring, and just another clue in
the puzzle that helped discover the actual problem.

"round-trips" being during the push (i.e. post commit).  Sorry I was using
the terminology of what was being shown on screen -- not combining the pre
and post commit numbers.

Ok, this produced a very long list starting thusly:

170716 unreachable artifacts:

Should I be worried?!

Not yet...   Please run:

fossil rebuild
fossil test-clusters

Then we'll get the true picture of  whether or not you have something to
be worried  about. The clusters are  only used for sync  operations, not
clone, so if one  goes missing, then it makes it  so clients cannot pull
new content (the original bug that was fixed).

So... doing fossil rebuild then test-clusters on the server results in
"all artifacts reachable through clusters".

Hooray!  However... doing then a sync on my clone, then doing the
fossil test-clusters again on the server results in:

170931 unreachable artifacts:
 127299 000017df491816cdbd40fcbca031950decdf9532
 150554 000067ad9657662b33a669d87934b6df91a62f71
 134125 000091fa0dc5528c0595b16c4cc56f9365bfbba0
 68008 0000cc81620bd3ff86379b744e4dae91df8f6175
 [...]

However, on my clone I get:

$ fossil test-clusters
all artifacts reachable through clusters

Both server and client are running 1.34.

Cheers
Andy

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to