On 15 July 2017 at 03:58, Johan Kuuse <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Venkat Iyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Consider me old fashioned, but the current behavior seems more in line with >> traditional unix (read sysv) commands. > > I don't want to make this a big deal, but I don't agree that the > commands behave the same way as traditional unix commands. > Examples: >
fossil ls This will list all of the files of the repo if no path is specified. Unix ls will only list files in that directory. This is the documented behavior or fossil: List all files in the current checkout. If PATHS is included, only the named files (or their children if directories) are shown. https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=ls _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
