On 22 November 2017 at 14:43, <[email protected]> wrote: > Nobody in their right mind would even consider Fossil (with its > in-built web server, wiki, and bugtracker) to run on such a system, so > why bother coding for it?
why not? fossil makes for a neat deployment client! yes, it can also be done with just an http client, but still is a nice option to have. but i haven't seen any reason to promote a language switch. nice as they are, C11 features make only easier development; not better code, much less any performance improvement or any user-visible advantage. SQLite _is_ used on lots of weird targets, and there's much shared code, and most importantly, shared code style. introducing an artificial split between them doesn't seem a good use of developer time. -- Javier _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
