On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:25:25 +0100, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/24/17, Johan Kuuse <[email protected]> wrote:
I think 'push' and 'pull' seems fair enough.
But what about 'rebase' and 'submodule'?
To what level should the Fossil-NG client support Git features not
present in Fossil?
Zero.
a good thing in my view ... but, consequently, users will run into the
"impedance mismatch" problem between the different systems mentioned by
several others, no?
If not supported, wouldn't there be a risk of users just sticking to
'git rebase' instead?
If users want to rebase, then they can use their Git client.
as they could for the rest of their interaction with the git repo. I
presume exactly that will happen: existing primary git users won't switch
to a different "git client" anyway. fossil users probably _would_ use the
ability of fossil-NG to talk to a git repo, though, as long as they don't
need to do git-specific fancy stuff. but I question whether implementing
this ability could increase the user base notably.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
