On 27 November 2017 at 14:13, Warren Young <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Which is better? >> >> A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline >> B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline > > I prefer A because I don’t like having to dig for details. Hiding details > isn’t the answer to clutter. Drawing the eye to key details first is the > right path. > > Here is a few minutes spent with option A’s CSS: > > https://imgur.com/a/w0mGF > > Key changes: > > 1. More “air” around each comment line > 2 Slight opacity drop and font size drop on details span to deemphasize it > 3. Details span pushed off to the lower right to visually separate it from > the comment > 4. Extra “air” around details span; ditto > 5. Borders added to separate timeline elements more clearly >
I like these changes! I definitely like the horizontal spacing around the check-ins and the check-in details to be slightly below the single line check-in information. Can we see this implemented on a timeline c option? Thanks for the work, Warren! best, j.b. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
